Clinton Conspiracies by Cynthia Dryer

Clinton Conspiracies

“Clinton” has been a household name for about two decades now, but how much do we really know about the famous political family? The spotlight currently shines on Hillary Rodham Clinton, the former New York Senator, and current presidential candidate. Since her husband, Bill Clinton, became attorney general of Arkansas, many conspiracies have developed including the “Clinton Body Count”, the infidelity of the power couple, and even the rumor that the Clintons are working with Google to hide articles that could damage Hillary’s reputation. We will explore these conspiracies and find how they apply to the Clinton family.

Hillary Clinton has been skirting the peripheral vision of the public eye for a few years now, but what made the famed politician into who we know, or think we know today? What is she hiding behind her confident façade? What is it that cannot be seen past the smile that seems to be permanently plastered onto her face? Beneath her external traits, we can infer from much evidence that Hillary Clinton is an individual who will stop at nothing to be successful.

Hillary Clinton has been skirting the peripheral vision of the public eye for a few years now, but what made the famed politician into who we know, or think we know today? What is she hiding behind her confident façade? What is it that cannot be seen past the smile that seems to be permanently plastered onto her face? Beneath her external traits, we can infer from much evidence that Hillary Clinton is an individual who will stop at nothing to be successful.

            Hillary Clinton has been a motivated character since her early days. Many influences to this behavioral trait stemmed from family life and situational circumstances. As the oldest child of three raised in a conservative family and living in an upper-class suburb near Chicago, Clinton was ingrained with the notion “to whom much is given, much is expected” from a young age (“Hillary Rodham Clinton” 1) This translated into using her family’s financial well-being into graduating Wellesley college with the highest distinction and attending Yale university (1). Her mother often made statements such as “You have to stand up for yourself. There's no room in this house for cowards,” leading us to assume that her upbringing molded Clinton’s internal traits to include resilience and a fighting spirit (“WBGH American Experience” 1). Her relatively rough upbringing and childhood memories may have inspired her to work in government positions involving children.

Other influences on Hillary Clinton’s character include internal and external conflicts seen in both her early life and later in her career. One of the most prominent conflicts may have been caused by her mother and father’s political opinions. It seems that Clinton was following in her father’s footsteps as a “staunch republican” until she claimed that “[The Republican Party] left her” and moved closer to her mother’s “closet democrat” views (“WBGH American Experience” 1). This could have been an attempt to include both her mother and father’s beliefs, as republican tendencies are still seen in her work today. Probably the most famous internal and external conflict of Hillary Clinton’s career, however, was the Monica Lewinski affair. Hillary Clinton’s response to the whole scandal won her much admiration in the professional way she handled the situation (1). There is no saying how much this took a toll on her, however, we could only imagine how she felt at the time.

The final character overview topic is moral and ethical standing. Hillary Clinton is not by any means an angel, and has climbed her way to the higher ranks in the government. Many suspicious occurrences such as Benghazi and her email scandal have shadowed her career. These questionable events have been overlooked by the media and in many instances, dropped in court due to a convenient lack of evidence. This has happened an alarming number of times. Of the few things that can be proven, however, we see time and time again her version of stretching the truth. An example of this could be found in one of her leaked emails:

*Hillary Clinton: “I'm Kind Of Far Removed” From The Struggles Of The Middle Class “Because The Life I've Lived And The Economic, You Know, Fortunes That My Husband And I Now Enjoy.” *“And I am not taking a position on any policy, but I do think there is a growing sense of anxiety and even anger in the country over the feeling that the game is rigged. And I never had that feeling when I was growing up. Never. I mean, were there really rich people, of course there were. My father loved to complain about big business and big government, but we had a solid middle class upbringing. We had good public schools. We had accessible health care. We had our little, you know, one-family house that, you know, he saved up his money, didn't believe in mortgages. So I lived that. And now, obviously, I'm kind of far removed because the life I've lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy, but I haven't forgotten it.” [Hillary Clinton Remarks at Goldman-Black Rock, 2/4/14] (“WikiLeaks” 1)

Per the email, she cannot relate to average Americans due to her fortunate circumstances, yet in the first presidential debate she played the “humble card” claiming, “I don't buy that. I have a different experience. My father was a small businessman. He worked really hard, he printed drapery fabrics on long tables where he pulled out those fabrics and he went down with the silkscreen and dumped the paint in and took the squeegee and kept going.” (“Fact Check and Analysis” 1). She stressed how difficult it was for her father to make a living, contradicting the easy life she explained in her email. As we can see, Hillary Clinton’s political career is dependent on her appearance to the American people. Her words are her greatest asset in the promotion of her image.

Hillary Clinton’s identity is a complex matter, and these few variables barely scratch the surface of her character development and motives. What we do know is that this driven entrepreneur will find a way to achieve her goals, regardless if the method is frowned upon or not. Her life is still a blur of activity and with every new event that leaves an impression, her persona is constantly being swayed. At the end of the day, however, the extent of her innermost thoughts remains a mystery to everyone except herself.

Concerning the many conspiracies surrounding the Clinton family, we can narrow them down to three very popular ones. These conspiracies are intertwined with one another and occur at roughly the same time. The first conspiracy is that of the “Clinton Body Count,” followed by the cases of infidelity of both Hillary and Bill Clinton, and finally the tampering of Google’s algorithm to aid her recent presidential campaign.

 Possibly the most popular theory of the three is that of the “Clinton Body Count” sometimes known as the “Clinton Kill List.” Many lists have been made concerning the deaths related to the political family ranging from five to several thousand deaths, all for the Clinton’s own agenda. The cause of death on file for many of these people include suicide, plane crash, and robbery gone wrong. The earliest of these allegedly happened on February 15, 1977, with a woman named Suzanne Coleman who was only twenty-six years old (“The Clinton Body-Count”, 1). She allegedly committed suicide by shooting herself in the back of the head and no autopsy was allowed (1). Coleman had had an affair with Bill Clinton while he was Attorney General for Arkansas and told her friends that the seven-month-old child she was carrying was indeed his (1). Many deaths under questionable circumstances followed the Clinton Family from that point on, the most common occurring being bodyguards, witnesses, and members of the Democratic National Committee. A more recent death revolving around the Clintons was that of Antonin Scalia, a Supreme Court Justice who was intent on seeing Hillary’s imprisonment (1). Scalia was found dead at the Cibolo Creek Ranch having died on February 12, 2016 (1). The ranch owner found him on top of his bedcovers with a pillow over his face (1). Even considering the mysterious death, there was no autopsy and embalmment was immediate (1). Three days prior to Scalia’s death, Wiki leaks shows us that Hillary’s campaign chairman John Podesta and DC lobbyist Steve Elmendorf emailed each other in code over the assassination three days before it took place (1). Under the subject line “Thanks,” Podesta wrote, “Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard” to which Elmendorf replied, “I’m all in. Sounds like it will be a bad nite, we all need to buckle up and double down” (1). It is well known that “Wet work” is a euphemism for assassination (1).

As the number of killings increase so do the believers. A recent survey showed that, 56% of twenty-five people believe the “Clinton Body Count” exists. Those who had known of the conspiracy previously were more inclined to believe in its actuality than those who had never heard of it. There is no doubt that many of these deceased people had some sort of connection with the Clintons. Some deaths are more far stretched than others and while the authorities have stated their conclusions over the cause of death, there are still so many wrong or missing variables in the ways they died.

The second conspiracy concerning infidelity occasionally ties in with the first conspiracy as many of Bill Clinton’s supposed mistresses have died of non-natural causes. The one side of the picture that we often neglect to see, however, is Hillary Clinton’s disloyalty. In 1984, it was rumored that Hillary Clinton was having an affair with Webster Hubbell, the former Mayor of Little Rock, Arkansas, and that it had been going on for years (@TPInsidr, 1). Hubbell spent fifteen months in jail for federal mail fraud and tax evasion, but before that could happen, he is said to have sired Chelsea Clinton (1). Hubbell and the Clinton’s only child share a few similarities within their facial features, most easily seen when their photos are placed side by side.

This conspiracy is the hardest to prove. Although they may sport many similar features, there is no concrete DNA evidence which states they are biologically related. The affair that took place was never proven and the only evidence that could confirm or deny this conspiracy is Chelsea’s DNA. In an interview with former Clinton aide named Larry Nichols, he stated that Bill confided in him that he was sterile due to contracting measles as a young boy (Dsiegel, 1). Bill at the time was dismissing the claims of one pregnant woman who held firm the notion that it was his child (1). In his situation, it would be easier to be considered sterile than to claim responsibility for his actions. This explanation would also counter many of the deaths in the “Clinton Body Count”, which has more cases, evidence, and witnesses to back it up.

The third and final conspiracy concerns Google search engine. In researching these topics before the determination of the president elect, Google would bury internet searches that would hurt Clinton’s image. The sights that would pop up normally would be those in favor of debunking conspiracies, usually that of the “Clinton Body Count.” Snopes.com, a sight that devotes itself to proving urban rumors false, has frequented the top of the page until other sites such as Whatreallyhappened.com, Clintonmemoriallibrary.com, and Govtslaves.info  were allowed on the main page as of recent. On the contrary, it was found that using Bing or Yahoo search engines would have the most popular conspiracy sights pop up at the very top, and often had these conspiracies auto-fill in the search bar. Google specifically rigged their algorithm, which changes six hundred times a year, to possibly change the outcome of the election (Dailymail, 1). As of now, it still does not auto-fill the search bar to anything jeopardizing her image. Some people even claim that by typing “Clinton Body” they only received results for car repair shops (1). Others still claim that while typing “Hillary Clinton Cri,” Google auto fills the search bar to “Hillary Clinton Crime Reforms” instead of “Hillary Clinton Crime” (1).

            The Google algorithm biased theory is the most believable of the three due to all the recent evidence and ability to test it out yourself. It would be routine to change the algorithms due to its constant updating and it would be easy to pull off due to the secrecy in which they are changed. The only way to know if information had been tampered with would be to dig into the various Google pages or try a different search engine. It is evident that Google is biased in their searches when it comes to the former presidential candidate.

After Hillary Clinton’s defeat in the presidential election, only time will tell if the killings will cease and if Google will change their algorithm to a fairer platform.

Although some seem farfetched, there could be at least a grain of truth in these three conspiracies. Their overlapping of one another was an interesting discovery and of course, at the middle of it all is Hillary Clinton. We can only wait and see if her recent presidential loss results in even more conspiracies, or if they die down along with her career. By learning more about the Clinton Body Count, the question of Chelsea’s real father, and Google’s hand in the Clinton’s recent campaign, we can conclude that the Clintons have their hands full. This family continues to hide its secrets, but as we all know, some skeletons refuse to stay in their closet.

Works Cited

Dailymail.com, Hannah Parry For. “Google Buries 'Clinton Body Count': Search Engine Accused of Hiding Negative Stories during Hillary's Campaign .” Daily Mail Online, Associated Newspapers, 2016, www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3754655/Google-buries-Clinton-body-count-Search-engine-accused-hiding-negative-stories-Hillary-s-campaign.html.

Dsiegel. “Exposed! Bill Clinton Paternity Bombshell: I’m Not Chelsea’s Real Dad!” National Enquirer, 30 June 2014, www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/exposed-bill-clinton-paternity-bombshell-im-not-chelseas-real-dad/.

“Fact Check And Analysis Of The First Presidential Debate ...” NPR, 26 Sept. 2016, http://www.npr.org/2016/09/26/495115346/fact-check-first-presidential-debate.

“Hillary Rodham Clinton.” Encyclopedia of World Biography, Gale, Detroit, Dec. 1998, Biography in Context, http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/bic1/biographiesdetailspage/biographiesdetailswindow?disablehighlighting=true&displaygroupname=biographies&currpage=&scanid=&query=&search_within_results=&p=bic1&mode=view&catid=gale|00000000ms9t&limiter=&display-query=&displaygroups=&contentmodules=&action=e&sortby=&documentid=gale|k1631001440&windowstate=normal&activitytype=&failovertype=&commentary=&source=bookmark&u=j084901001&jsid=a8e47e21e68143b6796ebfe7380a2ae6.

“THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED.” THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php#axzz4QNfkWopL.

“WGBH American Experience . Clinton | PBS.” PBS, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/biography/clinton-hillary/.

“WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails.” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927.

@TPInsidr. “HUGE Scandal - Chelsea Isn't Bill Clinton's Daughter? - The Political Insider.” The Political Insider, 16 July 2015, www.thepoliticalinsider.com/huge-scandal-chelsea-isnt-bill-clintons-daughter/.